Deterministic Governance for Healthcare AI
Healthcare cannot safely absorb probabilistic AI unless decision authority and accountability remain deterministic, traceable, and human-anchored.
The Abstract
While substantial emphasis is placed on model accuracy, a fundamental structural problem remains: clinical risk is borne by patients and clinicians, while probabilistic systems trigger clinical action. This paper advances the imposition of enforceable governance constraints on where and how probabilistic outputs may influence care [1].
Core Thesis
Determinism is not a demand for rule-based models, but for deterministic governance: authority is bounded, behavior is reproducible for audit, and accountability remains anchored to named humans [6].
The Safety Envelope Simulator
Operationalizing control at the point of care. See how a Deterministic Governance Layer overrides a Probabilistic AI recommendation based on critical patient vitals.
Clinical Alert Threshold: < 70 mg/dL (Hypoglycemia Risk)
Probabilistic Model Recommendation (Unbounded)
Operational Decision Logic
Rule: If Glucose < 70 mg/dL → Block Insulin Delivery [FDA Safety Protocol].
Deterministic Intervention
Safety Envelope Triggered: Probabilistic output blocked. High risk of hypoglycemic shock detected via real-time vitals.
Action Validated
AI suggestion falls within the human-defined clinical safety parameters for this patient context.
The Governance Spine
Deterministic governance does not emerge automatically. It requires a Governance Spine—a set of non-negotiable constraints defining authority, responsibility, and permitted actions prior to deployment [Maheshwari 2026].
Patient Safety & Dignity
Priority of safety over innovation velocity. Aligning with EU AI Act Art. 14.
Clinician Authority
Meaningful human oversight and override capabilities. Aligning with NIST Manage.
AI Boundaries
Explicit separation of probabilistic sensing from deterministic decision logic.
Global Regulatory Command Center
Synthesizing international frameworks with deterministic clinical logic.
Clinician Override Rates (2026)
The Signals of Trust: Deterministic governance yields override rates of 1.7%, whereas opaque "black box" systems see overrides surge to 73%, indicating a total loss of trust [14].
The Edge Imperative
75% of medical data is generated at the edge. Latency requirements (5-10ms) mandate local, deterministic guardrails. Decentralized clinical intelligence is the next frontier of safety [12].
The "Hollowed Mind" Risk
Capability-Comprehension Gap: As AI performance improves, clinician internal mental models and "epistemic grip" can deteriorate. We must define "AI Safe Zones" to prevent diagnostic deskilling [6].
The RATSe Rubric
Resilient AI Trust Score: Measuring Governance Maturity.
Deterministic Failure Trigger: Loss of Human Ownership
Deterministic Failure Trigger: Silent Degradation / Model Drift
Deterministic Failure Trigger: Audit Inability / Opaque Reasoning
Authoritative Compendium
[1] Topol EJ. High-performance medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56.
[2] NIST. AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST; 2023.
[3] Saria S, Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. JMLR. 2019;20(1):1-55.
[4] EU Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). 2024.
[5] US FDA. PCCP for ML-Enabled Medical Devices. FDA; 2024.
[6] Kelly CJ, et al. Key challenges for clinical impact with AI. BMC Med. 2019;17:195.
[7] India MeitY. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
[8] Stanford HAI. AI Index Report 2024. Stanford University.
[9] MIT CSAIL. Lessons from Aviation for Healthcare AI. MIT Jameel Clinic.
[10] OECD. Recommendation of the Council on AI. OECD; 2024.
Comments
Post a Comment