IRHAI-POL-005 (RUNTIME EDITION)
Runtime Governability & Execution Control
(Deterministic Control of Probabilistic Systems)
Moving governance from static pre-deployment validation to active, execution-layer operational infrastructure.
⛨ DOCTRINAL BINDING STATEMENT
AI systems may generate probabilistic inference. Execution authority must remain deterministic and explicitly governed. The Runtime Governability Architecture below acts as an active admissibility layer, enforcing IRHAI-POL-005 by conditionally restricting execution based on real-time epistemic signals.
Governance Operational Definition
5.1 The Governability Imperative
Traditional AI governance models designed for static systems fail during runtime operation. Modern clinical AI operates continuously, adapting and influencing workflows probablistically. Deployment is not the end of governance; deployment is where governance begins. Governability demands systems remain monitorable, interruptible, and bounded.
The Failure of Static Governance:
- ✖ Pre-deployment validation ignores runtime semantic drift.
- ✖ Retrospective audits occur after irreversible clinical actions.
- ✖ Documentation provides zero deterministic execution control.
Runtime Governability Requirements:
- ✔ Admissibility: Dynamic gating of AI outputs.
- ✔ Containment: Deterministic authority boundaries.
- ✔ Degradation: Fail-safe state transitions (S2→S5).
"Accuracy is statistical. Safety is structural."
// Inference layer generates probabilities.
// Governance layer enforces execution admissibility deterministically.
Execution Governance Pipeline
The mandatory separation of probabilistic inference from operational authority.
1. Clinical Vector Input
System ingests contextual patient data, workflow states, and external requests.
2. Probabilistic Generation
Model evaluates inputs and generates an inference. Crucially, this output possesses zero execution authority.
3. Admissibility & DAEE
The runtime governance plane intercept. Evaluates semantic drift and Decision Admissibility (DAEE) before granting authority.
4. Deterministic Execution
Only admissible outputs are executed, bound by institutional protocols and strictly gated containment bounds.
RGA Runtime Governance Console
⚙ DAEE: Admissibility Engine
Evaluates real-time "Decision Admissibility & Execution Eligibility". It monitors probabilistic outputs for epistemic uncertainty, hallucination markers, and semantic drift, scoring the system's current governability state.
ЁЯЫб️ ACP: Authority Control Protocol
Enforces deterministic containment. Translates the DAEE state (S2-Normal, S3-Restricted, S4-Escalated, S5-Contained) into strict execution boundaries, ensuring AI systems never silently influence clinical workflows without proper gating.
Governability State
Execution Authority
POLICY BINDING
- [R1] Telemetry Active
- [R2] Admissibility Gate
- [R3] Authority Bounded
- [R4] Orchestration Isolate
- [R5] S5 Fail-Closed
Telemetry: Epistemic Confidence vs Semantic Drift
Real-time DAEEDAEE Telemetry Object
{
"inference_id": "inf-uuid",
"semantic_drift": "float",
"daee_status": "enum",
"auth_route": "enum",
"orchestration": "bool",
"audit_hash": "sha256"
}
Live Intercept Payload
{
"inference_id": "inf-88x2",
"semantic_drift": 0.02,
"daee_status": "admissible",
"auth_route": "advisory",
"orchestration": "secure",
"audit_hash": "e3b0c442..."
}
Inject Runtime Constraints
Operational Trace Ledger
Comments
Post a Comment